Monday, July 29, 2013

The brotherhood

For all my non-biker friends, let me decode a ritual you may have seen.

Bikes, when they pass each other, wave.

Sometimes it is a big ole wave, fingers spread, palms forward, like a toddler waving to a parent in a crown.

Some guys just lift their fingers off the left handlebar grip.

More recently it seems to be a closed hand, with two fingers extended together, usually pointed down.  (The Jersey single-finger salute is not encouraged, and you could end up with black and blue marks on your body for using it.)

Originally - or at least as early as I can remember - the wave was more of a "Black Power" clenched fist, with the elbow at a right angle.  This is the wave I use - mostly because my current steed has a very upright style, and it is easier to raise my hand up than to drop it below the bars. 

Every biker seems to have their own opinion on who should be waved to  Some bikers only return a wave, never initiate one.  Some only wave to bikers riding the same brand or style bike that they are riding - Harley being the most common example of this snobbery, although sport bikers sometimes only wave to other crotch rockets.

I wave to everyone on two wheels.  And I do mean everyone.  I have waved to scooters, mopeds, and every bike I have passed.  Heck, I have even waved at a full grown man on a mini-bike that had a seat that couldn't have been more than 8 inches off the ground - and he was ecstatic, if his return wave was any indication.

My reasoning is that we - the two-wheeled riders - are a community.  Whether I am riding solo, or riding with my association (http://www.cmausa.org/), or as part of an event, I have a bond with every other biker out there.  I stop for every one I see on the side of the road.  I am much more likely to say "Hello!" at a stop, even if we are just putting gas in the tanks. 

In short, bikers are my brothers and sisters.

There are some that look rougher than others, sure.  But they are still God's creatures, and they deserve my respect, and prayers, and, if they need it, whatever assistance I can render.

No matter what they ride, or what their patch says.

Here, for your enjoyment, is a collection of WHY different bikers don't wave.

Top 10 reasons sportbikers don't wave:

10. They have not been riding long enough to know they're supposed to.
9. They're going too fast to have time enough to register the movement and respond.
8. You weren't wearing bright enough gear.
7. If they stick their arm out going that fast they'll rip it out of the socket.
6. They're too occupied with trying to get rid of their chicken strips.
5. They look way too cool with both hands on the bars or they don't want to unbalance themselves while standing on the tank.
4. Their skin tight-kevlar-ballistic-nylon-kangaroo-leather suits
prevent any position other than fetal.
3. Raising an arm allows bugs into the armholes of their tank
tops.
2. It's too hard to do one-handed stoppies.
1. They were too busy slipping their flip-flop back on.

Top Ten Reasons Why Harley Riders Don't Wave Back

10. Afraid it will invalidate warranty.
9. Leather and studs make it too heavy to raise arm.
8. Refuses to wave to anyone whose bike is already paid for.
7. Afraid to let go of handlebars because they might vibrate off.
6. Rushing wind would blow scabs off the new tattoos.
5. Angry because just took out second mortgage to pay luxury tax on new Harley.
4. Just discovered the fine print in owner's manual and realized H-D is partially owned by Honda.
3. Can't tell if other riders are waving or just reaching to cover their ears like everyone else.
2. Remembers the last time a Harley rider waved back, he impaled his hand on spiked helmet.
1. They're too tired from spending hours polishing all that chrome to lift their arms.


Top Ten Reasons Why Gold Wing Riders Don't Wave Back

10. Wasn't sure whether other rider was waving or making an obscene gesture.
9. Afraid might get frostbite if hand is removed from heated grip.
8. Has arthritis and the past 400 miles have made it difficult to raise arm.
7. Reflection from etched windshield momentarily blinded him.
6. The espresso machine just finished.
5. Was actually asleep when other rider waved.
4. Was in a three-way conference call with stockbroker and accessories dealer.
3. Was distracted by odd shaped blip on radar screen.
2. Was simultaneously adjusting the air suspension, seat height,programmable CD player, seat temperature and satellite navigation system.
1. Couldn't find the "auto wave back" button on dashboard.


Top Ten Reasons Why BMW Riders Don't Wave Back

10. New Aerostich suit too stiff to raise arm.
9. Removing a hand from the bars is considered "bad form."
8. Your bike isn't weird enough looking to justify acknowledgement.
7. Too sore from an 800-mile day on a stock "comfort" seat.
6. Too busy programming the GPS, monitoring radar, listening to ipod, XM, or talking on the cell phone.
5. He's an Iron Butt rider and you're not!.
4. Wires from Gerbings is too short.
3. You're not riding the "right kind" of BMW.
2. You haven't been properly introduced.
1. Afraid it will be misinterpreted as a friendly gesture.


Top Ten Reasons Why UJM Riders Don't Wave Back

10. Something's buzzing around the tank.
9. Do you hear than noise the valves are making?
8. Trying to push start.
7. Just felt something shimmy.
6. Trying to isolate source of resonant shudder.
5. Hypnotized by digital gear indicator
4. Needs that hand to affect on-the-fly repairs
3. Previous owner replaced #3 with a 2.5
2.5. Mentally reviewing which parts use SAE and which use metric.
2. Wait, there's a number 2? This bike never had a #2, did it? ****!
1. Can't see your tank badge to determine what brand of bike you're on.


Why scooter riders don't wave back:

10. If you knew what a 10" wheel was like at 50mph, you wouldn't let go of the bars either.
9. And risk droping the PBR 12-pack?
8. Didn't see you - catching a few winks on the way home from an all night clambake.
7. It's a mod vs. rocker thing.
6. They just let the cloud of blue smoke trailing behind the scooter act as their "wave".
5. Hey, if you want 140 mpg, you gotta keep your elbows and knees in and your hands down on the bars.
4. The forty year old original hand grip on their vintage Vespa would fly apart if they let go of it.
3. Yes, I saw you. No Gucci - no gesture.
2. They're being filmed during a commercial shoot for a trendy lifestyle product nobody really needs.
1. Why do motorcyclists keep pointing toward the ground with two fingers when they ride by? What is that? What does it mean?



Sunday, July 14, 2013

Race, guns, and George Zimmerman

George Zimmerman was found "Not Guilty" last night.

I really didn't think, logically, there could have been any other decision.

The prosecutor was bullied by the media (those with both a liberal and anti-handgun bias) into charging Zimmerman, when the case never merited bringing Second Degree Murder charges in the first place.  If the prosecutor who took Zimmerman to trial is an elected position in Florida, he may find himself out of a job soon.  (And, if his is an elected position, it may explain why he arraigned Zimmerman in the first place, when most legal pundits thought the case was weak.)

Luckily the 6 jurors had more sense than the media, and Zimmerman may have some semblance of his life back.  Zimmerman, however, still has to live with the fact that he killed a 17 year old black man.  He has to live with the fact that he is a minor celebrity.  That he may even be a target for people "looking to get justice for Travon Martin".

That we each have a right to defend ourselves and our families is a basic, God-given right, but that was not what the trial was about.  Did Zimmerman go "looking for trouble"?  Maybe.  Was he injured in a confrontation?  Most assuredly - his basic description of what happened hasn't changed since his initial statement to police.  Was Martin a bad kid, looking to get into mischief?  Probably not, but he did make a bad decision to physically confront Zimmerman.  Did he deserve to die?  Absolutely not, but, to quote Clint Eastwood's character in "Unforgiven", when it comes to death, "deserves got nothing to do with it."

There were a hundred ways this situation could have gone differently, most of them better  Unfortunately, once there was a shot fired, every anti-handgun media outlet jumped on the bandwagon of proclaiming second amendment supporters as "Gun Nuts", with the argument that had Zimmerman been unarmed, the outcome would have been the "correct" one - Martin would have beaten the snot out of Zimmerman.

The anti-racist groups overreached and tried to make this about racial profiling - possibly before realizing Zimmerman was a minority himself.  I have heard reports that this is just "Old South" justice, that the "Black Man gets no justice".  But that is an oversimplification of the case - if the dead man had been white, and the accused black, it would have changed little - a person, who is being physically assaulted, has a right to defend themselves - and if you are in Florida, or any other "Stand your ground" state, you have a right to use deadly force if you believe your own life is in danger.  Period.  The law is colorblind.

What if Martin had been armed?  Then he would have had a right to call the police, confront his follower, and hold him until police arrived.  Had Zimmerman jumped Martin, then Martin could have, legally, defended himself with deadly force.

I am sorry for the family of Trayvon Martin, I truly am.  But just because he died does not make him innocent of his fate.  He made a couple bad choices.  He attacked a man that was, unknown to him, licensed to carry a firearm, and armed.  I hope this serves as a cautionary tale to every other person out there - you do not know who is armed, so it is probably best to assume everyone is.

The media is liberally biased - although my liberal friends will try and argue it isn't.  Like the OJ trial in the 1990's, this is yet another case to pit the minorities against Caucasians - never mind that Zimmerman is a minority.  There will be protest across the country over the next week or two, and probably renewed call to further restrict the right to keep or carry handguns.  Teary eyed reporters will show the Martin family in shock - because the media and the "Black Leaders" lied to them, pretending there was a winnable case against Zimmerman. 

There are no winners in this case, except for maybe the "Black Leaders" and the media pundits on both sides of the isle.  They will continue to make money of of Martin's misery.  Zimmerman will find himself sued in civil court, I am sure.  He may win, but most likely (since the burden of proof is so much lower) he will be forced to pay thousands or millions of dollars for doing something that was perfectly legal.  Everyone loses.

As for me, I will continue to do what I do.  I carry a handgun much of the time.  With God's grace I will never have to use it, but I will protect my life or my family of needed.

After all, as the old adage goes, "It is better to be judged by twelve than carried by six."